Human Survival

HUMAN SURVIVAL

“Look after self, kin and community: if people’s needs are met in compassionate and simple ways, the environment surrounding them will prosper”—permacultureprinciples.com

 

ORIGINS

Survival happens, and we are left in awe of the world we inhabit, and in our own capacities, our thoughts and feelings, our imagination and creativity, our commonness and connectivity to life as it is. A reference to survival brings focus to our common relative heritage, and as the breadth of relationships between human animals and non-human animals and the earth has expanded, to identify vegaculture as a point of contact with history and tradition.

While clothing, energy and shelter have a fascinating history, our focus will be on the adaption of food sources and we shall discover, just as the survivor exists as part of the whole, so the whole is also incorporated into the survivor!

The origin of life remains a mystery, and while the search for understanding the biological nature of the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) in the tree of life continues, that which is represented by a set of 355 genes estimated to have lived some 3.5-3.8 billion years ago (Ref.1), science understands the earliest signature are microbes, single cell organisms or micro-organisms, which extensively inhabit earth, with only around 1% being identified, leaving plenty of room for further investigation. We continue to search for water and microbes, as a sign of life elsewhere in the universe (Ref.2).

 

In a recent BBC documentary (Ref.3), while David Attenborough was holding a newborn baby in his arms, he expressed it this way:

“[This baby’s] ancestry like that of all of us stretches back over 500 million years to a tiny little worm-like creature swimming in the bottom of the sea.” Continuing to refer to the child, he said: “reptiles gave him his watertight skin. Tiny nocturnal mammals donated a bigger brain, sharper senses, and the manner in which he was born. His hands and colour vision came from the fruit-eating primates; and his larger brain and greater intelligence from the first humans.” And David Attenborough’s grand conclusion: “So all our features of our body can be traced back to our ancient ancestor”.

However we can also refer to our human origins in other ways, in fact our truest identity in our subjective human experience is to confirm our existence, which is often stated, as “I am I,” a realisation that can rapidly limit further conversation! We can also hold experience at arms length and cognise knowingness that is a mystery beyond expression; just as readily we accept that we are conscious, this is ever our experience, but we are ignorant of the origin of consciousness. An insatiable quest for life and a path of discovery of the unknown “I’ are at the foundation of human survival; and it seems, our greatest responsibility.

Natures Intent

Nature may or may not have any ‘intentions’, but it won’t deter some of us from concluding that it does; what is clear though, is that change is inevitable and every thing is living, and interacting, with every other thing. It may be a rock weathering, a microbe moving, a person talking, a fog lifting, a dog sniffing, or the familiar butterfly flapping its wings, but each and every movement or stillness is part of the whole that is occurring at any instant; could it be that we are that whole?

Humans have claimed a unique capacity for consciousness, what evolution shows is a continual interfacing, with nature trialing the progress of its many manifestations daily for billions of years, adapting and accumulating experience in self-reliance, and creative problem solving, sharing and co-operating, experimenting and honing survival techniques. There were times when the challenges of nature were almost insurmountable; it is generally accepted that the total world human population stood at just 10,000 people around 60,000 years ago (Ref.4).

Attributing an intent in the first instance, and then double-guessing a response is a game at which we humans are very good; for enquiry is indeed a seed for thought, and something we generate habitually. The scientist Rupert Sheldrake (Ref.5) ‘accepts the notion that the world constitutes a series of fixed habits, not fixed laws.’ Science recently, it seems, has suggested multiple models of both this and parallel universes, where evolution may have no relevance, and the function of time may turn out to be non- existent (Ref.6).

Social evolution demonstrates a continued lack of foresight and extended deliberation to make fundamental changes to the way in which the mechanisms of the social order operate so as to benefit everyone; a dearth of enlightened experiences to address inequality does not only extend back to the dark ages, but throughout recorded history. Non-violent action has made some progress, but redistribution of nutritional wealth is needed, as malnutrition continues, even though the numbers of obese and overweight people has exceeded the numbers in hunger for over a decade (Ref.7,8).

The enquiry arises, ‘can cultures co-exist peacefully?’ or does the challenge of a relative existence, separateness in subject-object, body and mind, them and us, preclude this possibility? Do we need to resurrect a common God, or can we form a consensus, a unity of consciousness of a shared global culture, with many manifestations of value and worth and rights, to unite and peacefully exist together while building the harmony into longevity, a sustainable solution?

Humans have elevated their self importance in the natural world to such a level that the present era of history has been defined as the Anthropocene; human ‘endeavour’ has been so significant that it is officially recognised as having scaled the geological time scale, which by the way is quite a bit higher than Mount Everest!

The list of social and environmental issues that demand attention keeps growing while nature responds with a growing ferocity. Comprehending life from nature’s perspective given our long history of fighting for survival should come easily, and we already know the solutions.

Life is, and the approach to any issue can only ever be improved by approaching with an abundance of compassion and justice. With over 7.6 billion people, with a strong interest in happiness and freedom, the numbers are there, and rising. Combating our own ego has become the number one priority of the human species.

I ask the question: what is my intent, and can a Vegaculture help?

Community

Commonly understood as a group of people living in the same place or having a particular characteristic in common, community is representative of the many aspects of individuals in the collective, and as a consequence, able to be interrogated for its own sake. History confirms our extraordinary capacity for survival; an expanding group of social animals in a Garden of Eden, where ‘strength in numbers’ has brought the human story into the arena of modernity, a magical and inspirational opportunity for interaction and understanding.

The reason for introducing community into the vegaculture discussion is pretty obvious, as we need to consider social and cultural issues, and any discussion of survival must surely embrace the wealth of community. We often consider contact with ‘like-minded’ people as one of the fulcrums in life, a place where we feel secure and accepted, and able to relax and be at ease; where daily challenges can be shared or avoided, at least for a while. Recognising our own need for communication, and then identifying the preferred outlet and place of respite can be considered an art; the science and fine art of community interaction, maybe an essential aspect of the human condition.

Usually, our circle of influence begins with family, and broadens as relationships and interests and circumstance determine. As we mature, so does our capacity for co-operation and sharing grow, and underlying this process is a sense of the common good. Like numerous other community influences, vegaculture can be viewed as a part of the web of communication, of the web of life. As an expression of the common good, it surely has a ‘place of pride,’ not in the sense of personal pride, but as a valued place to call home, where we can meet people with openness and shared values, where our endeavour will continue to enhance sustainable living practices and hence, community reinforcement and survival.

Food Security

“See harmony trying to find itself”–Canela Meyers

There are many reasons why it is important to uncover and document our dietary history, including the relationship of food security and diet within a broad understanding of evolution, the discovery of our heritage, and the development of comparative anatomy and the survival skills of our ancestors. It is interesting to study the variety of traditional foods, but a chasm of availability now exists between the food choices we take for granted in a sophisticated market place, and what our ancient ancestors may have chosen if lucky, or eaten if hungry. The reference to past habits is one factor in our dietary history, but not solely useful as the only relevant means by which to construct our diet.

The necessity to contemplate and fully understand the relationships between universal access to land and infrastructure resources, effective and sustainable crop production, environmental and species protection, efficiency in food nutrient conversion, means that food security is high on the agenda of topics for discussion. Political point scoring is rife in the planning debates around population numbers and rates of increase, and food security is regularly quoted and often misused to justify dubious opinions.

The following presentation gives an overview of food security in my local compact region of Far Northern Queensland (FNQ), which used to grow tobacco, but now has an abundance of fruit and vegetable growers; an excellent irrigation scheme is in place, with variable soils and water quality, and a wide range of climate zones. Fruits such as mango, avocado, papaya, pineapples, banana and exotic tropical varieties are foundation crops, and farmers continue to experiment with crop plantings to maximise returns based on predicted market demands. Nearly all vegetables can be grown, and everything from stone fruits, berries and kiwifruit to jackfruits and durian, are available locally in conventional and organic forms, with weekly local markets and a thriving industry.

Arguably, the FNQ region with a population around 278,000 people at an average of around one person per square kilometre, [compare to India at 382 people/sq. km!], has close to the best food security in Australia, but let us have a closer look at how we purpose and manage this excellent fertile region, and what are the outcomes.

Climate change around Innisfail in the usually wettest area of the state, whose community relies almost solely on banana production, had farmers in 2017 raising the possibility of adding farm irrigation for the first time, and fertiliser run off to the World Heritage Great Barrier Reef continues to be needed to be monitored for pollution effects. While the region relies on a pristine environment to secure the tourist supported economy, this activity represented an additional influx of around 900,000 international tourists and 1.8 million domestic visitors in 2016-17 who also needed feeding (Ref.9).

Coal seam gas provided just 3 per cent of Queensland gas in the late nineties, and in 2013-14 this had elevated to 90 per cent (Ref.10); so far there are no local wells, but exploration is hovering. Small sections of the best fertile land have seen residential development, while large areas are utilised for sugar cane; with some being transported in 2017, hundreds of unnecessary kilometres along public roads every ten minutes or so, twenty four hours a day for months on end in tandem trucks, due to pricing wars between competing sugar mills.

The Northern Queensland Primary Health Network (NQPHN) released its 2018 Mareeba Health Needs Review (Ref.11), and after an extensive community review, key findings include:

* the most common potentially preventable hospitalisations in Mareeba are diabetes complications, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

* 62 per cent of adults are obese or overweight

* 91 per cent have insufficient daily vegetable intake

* 46 per cent have insufficient physical activity

* 18 per cent are daily smokers

* 25 per cent drink alcohol at levels that cause lifetime risk of health problems

Ironically, the local newspaper reported the NQPHN provider as commenting: “We look forward to collaborating further with providers and the community to ensure provision of high-quality, comprehensive primary health care for Mareeba residents, and helping them to live happier, healthier, longer lives.” Don’t despair as it might still get better! Not that these health inadequacies are the fault of the provider, but the lack of education and integration of social responsibilities for caring that precede our current status as a generation of sick individuals would surely demand a Royal Commission in other circumstances.

The major exported products from Queensland, which covers 22.5% of the continent, as a percentage of total Australian exports in 2014-15, were 43% of meat and meat preparations, 49% of sugars and sugar preparations and honey, 48% of coal, coke and briquettes, 50% of animal oils and fats, and 89% of fertilizers (Ref.12).

Land clearing in Australia is a world hot spot, with around 400, 000 acres being cleared in Queensland, on par with Brazil, and a combined threat to well over 100 animal and plant species even though there is supposed to be protection from the Nature Conservation Act.

I was always intrigued by the massive expanses of countryside, and wondered what valuable production was supported, and could it be considered to be essential for sustainable trading? I would love to believe that I can visualise ‘harmony trying to find itself,’ but I guess there are limits to everyone’s imagination.

Elsewhere, casual observation alone confirms there is hardly anyone at all visible in the agricultural and farming landscape in most Western destinations, where farm machinery is integral with the whole of farm production process; and there continues to be a significant movement to larger properties, with a corresponding reduction in younger people taking up farming. The situation here is in stark contrast to nearby, lower socio-economic countries, where one often finds the landscapes teaming with people and animals working together to secure food supplies, eking out a simple existence using traditional methods.

The average age of farmers continues to increase and is mostly in the ‘over 50 year old ‘ age bracket in all destinations. Surveys show an average age of farmers in Australia as 52 years, with the US now at 58 years, and 67 years in Japan. The same reference shows “more than one third of European farmers are older than 65, while less than 5% of farmers in analyzed countries are younger than 35-years-old! All OECD countries show similar trends ” (Ref.13).

In 2016, a Japanese ‘Wwoofa,’ (Willing Worker On Organic Farms, Australia) showed me images of his 93-year-old grandmother planting rice in the rice field. Of the 100 rice and mixed produce farms in his valley, he is one of only two people of his generation who have decided to stay and work the farms. Like many issues that arise, food security is highly dependant on the distribution of resources, which provides a means for understanding both the problem and the solution.

The potential spread of viruses among livestock is rife, especially when living in close quarters, and the major use of antibiotics is in animal agriculture, mainly in the factory farming industry. Feeding of animal products to vegetarian animals can still occur, although regulations have been tightened in many countries around the world.

Strict laws govern the quality of food and labelling that is supposed to be in the marketplace, and those aspects of food security are not being pursued further in this publication other than to mention that in Australia, it is illegal to feed any meat or meat products to market pigs for this very reason. One detects a hint of darker irony in a system that restricts animal foods to purported omnivores, and yet elsewhere has continued to feed them to vegetarians.

An extensive study of 500 food supply scenarios based on no deforestation, was undertaken and published in 2016. The study revealed “global veganism would allow the most options for food production, while global rich meat-based diet would allow the least options. The differences in viability of diets compares a vegan diet at 100% of cases possible, a vegetarian diet in 94% of cases, about two-thirds for the average diet today, while a Western style meat based diet would work in only 15 % of the cases modeled (Ref.14).

A Vegans Australia report, entitled ‘Impact of a vegan agricultural system on land use’ (Ref.15), confirms the freeing up of grazing lands would add surplus cropping lands for the same comparative nutrient output from plant foods, whilst offering additional land uses such as forestry for logging and biochar from tree crops. Land restoration and regeneration of degraded areas could also proceed, with further potential for expansion of irrigation systems to increase overall food production, and hence food security.

This movement to a vegan agricultural system will eventually expand our overall farm capacity, and as the movement from carnism to veganism gathers momentum, the ability to be self sufficient and effective with our resources, will be seen to be a natural fit in the post carnism phase of social transformation. The international organisation ‘Beyond Carnism’ (Ref.16) founded by social justice advocate Dr. Melanie Joy exposes the myth of carnism and supports people being as vegan as possible; ‘this shift in consciousness will positively assist all of the metrics that measure our impact on the state of the health of ourselves, other species and the whole of the rest of the planet”.

NOD NOD, WINK WINK, SAY NO MORE!